Author: hinanorey

  • GENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING TONIGHT

    Join the ECDPH today March 14, 2016 at Olelo Mapunapuna from 5pm to 8pm for our General Membership Meeting and Talk Story series!

    The Environmental Caucus of the Democratic Party of Hawaii invites you to our “Talk Story with DLNR Director Susan Case on Hawaiiʻs Environmental Future”

    Agenda for the Evening

    General Membership Meeting at 5pm to 5:30pm

    Refreshments from 5:30 pm to 6pm

    Talks Story in the Studio at 6pm to 7pm

    ECDPH General membership meeting will be held in the outdoor area in front of the Main entrance to Olelo Mapunapuna Studio

    WHEN: MARCH 14, 2016 – MONDAY @ 5 PM – 8 PM

    WHERE: OLELO MAPUNAPUNA STUDIOS –

    1122 MAPUNAPUNA ST. IN HONOLULU, HAWAII

    FREE PARKING WHERE AVAILABLE

    POTLUCK DISHES WELCOME

    RSVP : JUANITA OR BARBARA @ 808-330-6224

  • Critical Announcement regarding the future of Energy in Hawaii

    This event is co-sponsored by Americans for Democratic Action, Hawaii Chapter, and by Progressive Democrats of Hawai.

    Submitted on behalf of Alan Burdick

    –  Mahalo Alan

    A reminder to all that on Sunday, 08 FEB 15, ADA/H will be holding a public forum at 1:30 p.m. in the Mānoa Public Library [with lots of parking] second floor meeting room with Rep Chris Lee on the HECO – NEXTERA merger. It looks like a good forum on a bad deal. The Florida alligators who run NextEra have a reputation that is so bad that even pro-business Forbes Magazine says they’re a bunch of crooks.

    If we cannot be 100% sure that the Hawaii PUC will be held to the highest standards of public interest [unlike their totally corrupt Florida counterparts] Hawaii is in for a very rough time. Please come to the forum and, in the meantime, take a look the attached [pdf available] article from today’s Forbes for your reading [dis]pleasure.

    * * *

    1/30/2015

    FORBES MAGAZINE

    What Is At Stake For Hawaii In NextEra Energy – HECO Merger

    NextEra Energy, the holding company based in Juno Beach, FL, wants to buy all three of Hawaii’s electric utilities.

    One aspect of the acquisition that has not attracted much attention is the limited applicability of federal energy regulation to utilities in Hawaii.

    Except in a few minor instances, utilities in Hawaii are not regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). By contrast, Florida Power& Light (FPL), a subsidiary of NextEra Energy, is regulated by the FERC.

    The reason for the discrepancy is that the FERC only regulates energy sold in interstate commerce. Hawaii’s power system is isolated.

    In the 1970s, FLP sued the FERC to limit the scope of federal energy regulation to sales of electricity that actually crossed state lines. The lawsuit went all of the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held that federal regulators have jurisdiction over any transmission lines that are part of a power grid that crosses state lines.

    Hawaii and Alaska are the only two states with power grids that are physically isolated from any other state. (Texas is not technically isolated from other power grids but has limited federal oversight anyway).

    This issue is especially important right now because Hawaii is considering construction of an undersea cable that would interconnect the power grids on the islands of Oahu and Maui. Currently, Hawaii has three stand-alone power grids: one grid serves the Big Island, another grid serves Maui and a third grid serves Oahu.

    In nearly any other state, the inter-island cable project being considered in Hawaii would be subject to various federal rules and regulations designed to ensure consumers receive the benefits of robust competition.

  • Information about urgent action requested- Not meant as a representation of views of caucus members or the Democratic Party of Hawaii

    This Friday, the Board of Land and Natural Resources will be voting on an approval in principal of the acquisition of a conservation easement over 654 acres of shoreline line spanning from Kawela Bay to Kahuku Point.  The staff submittal describing the proposed approval is attached.  The Trust for Public Land’s DRAFT testimony is attached.
    Please consider sending in testimony in support to  kuulei.n.moses@hawaii.gov.
    To send in testimony, reference Agenda Item D-28.  The following are bullet points that you can consider including in your testimony:
    • The conservation easement will protect five miles of shoreline spanning from Kawela Point to Kahuku Point, 654 acres of shoreline land, and important scenic, recreational, and ecologically important resources.
    • Endangered Hawaiian monk seals have been documented pupping and resting along this shoreline.
    • Threatened Hawaiian green sea turtles bask and nest along the shoreline.
    • Migratory birds and endangered Hawaiian waterbirds frequent the area, including Punaho`olapa Marsh
    • Approximately five miles of recreational coastal trails located on private owned land will be made available to the public
    Mahalo for your support –
    Lea
    Lea Hong
    Hawaiian Islands State Director
    The Trust for Public Land
    1003 Bishop Street
    Pauahi Tower, Suite 740
    Honolulu, HI  96813
    (808) 524-8563 (direct)
    (808) 783-3653 (cell)
  • Mahalo Marjorie Zeigler for this comprehensive update regarding the proposed expansion of the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument

    From Marjorie Zeigler on August 8, 2014:

    Aloha, everyone!  Mahalo nui loa to all who attended NOAA’s Town Hall Meeting on the proposed expansion of the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument on Monday night.  Many of you asked me how the meeting went, so here is a brief summary.  It was quite a scene with approx. 200+ folks in attendance (NOAA anticipated 100 at most).  The meeting room was too small, of course, and it was standing-room only in the room and hallway.  More than 60 people testified.  Additional people signed up to testify, but they left before the meeting ended.  More people testified in support of the proposed expansion than in opposition.  All of the testimony was recorded and will be summarized and submitted to NOAA officials and, presumably, President Obama.  Folks from Kaua‘i, Moloka‘i, Maui, and the Big Island flew over to testify in support of the expansion.  Supporters included scientists, Native Hawaiian practitioners, fishers and descendants of fishing families, conservationists, community leaders, and youth.  Attendees were polite (with a few exceptions), and the meeting went smoothly, ending at 7:30 pm.  A coalition of supporters hosted a nice hospitality room with ‘ono food, refreshments, and coffee.  It was fun meeting and talking story with fellow supporters from across the state.  Mahalo nui loa to our hosts.

    Now is the time for everyone to weigh in, whether you live in Hawai‘i, elsewhere in the Pacific, or on the continent. We have until this Friday, August 15, 2014 to submit written comments to NOAA in SUPPORT of expanding the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument out to 200 nautical miles.   This is an amazing natural area – a wonderful living ocean legacy for our children and future generations.  The proposed expansion is a huge positive step for the U.S.  Some individuals and large commercial interests are contacting NOAA to express their opposition to the proposed expansion.  All of us must submit our comments in strong SUPPORT if this is going to happen.  Don’t sit this one out!

    Please sign the online petition, sign one of the online letters (whichever applies), and, most importantly, email NOAA brief comments in SUPPORT.  All the links are below.  It will only take a few minutes, and it will make a positive difference.  Then share this email widely with others.  Apologies for duplicate postings.  Mahalo nui loa for caring and taking action!

    1.  Sign the online petition to President Obama in support of the expansion at <http://bit.ly/SupportPRIMNM>  Your signature is needed, and it only takes a minute.

    2.  Sign one of these group letters to President Obama in support of the expansion:

    3.  Email your own personal comments to NOAA in support of the expansion <PRI@noaa.gov>

    Background:

     

    The Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument was established by George W. Bush in 2009, and is located within the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone.  The monument covers approximately 83,000 square miles in the south-central Pacific Ocean, about 1,000 miles southwest of the Hawaiian Islands.  It encompasses seven islands and atolls:  Wake, Johnston, Baker, Howland, Kingman, Jarvis, and Palmyra.

    On June 17, 2014, at the Our Ocean conference hosted by Secretary of State John Kerry, President Obama announced his intention to expand the existing boundaries of the monument to 200 nautical miles, the full expanse of U.S. jurisdiction in these waters.

    Global Significance of the Expansion:

     

     

    • The expanded Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument includes some of the richest areas on earth for ocean life, home to countless seabird, marine mammal, fish, sea turtle, coral, and other marine invertebrate species.
    • Large predatory fishes, such as tuna, swordfish, marlin, and sharks, are still found in these waters, even though their populations have been significantly depleted in the past 50 years.
    • Five species of protected sea turtle also inhabit these waters as migratory and feeding grounds, including the leatherback turtle, which is near extinction because of human activities.
    • The proposed area is habitat for 22 protected marine mammal species, including the Hawaiian monk seal, blue whale and a new species recently described by scientists – the Palmyra beaked whale.  Seven of these marine mammal species are endangered.
    • Several million seabirds of 19 species congregate around or nest in the monument.  These birds forage in the waters surround the current monument out to 200 nautical miles and farther, feeding themselves and their chicks.
    • These waters are of global and regional ecological importance for marine mammals, sea turtles, large predatory fish, and seabirds.  These are highly migratory species that range widely throughout the tropical central and western Pacific.  Because many of them congregate around seamounts, the additional protection of 241 seamounts in the expanded monument would be significant.  Equally important would be protection for corals and invertebrate communities.

    Complementing Other Marine Conservation Initiatives:

     

     

    • In 2010, the nations of the world agreed to set aside 10 percent of the world’s ocean in protected areas by 2020 (one of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets).  Many scientists and marine conservationists estimate that to ensure the health and productivity of our oceans and marine fisheries, at least 20-30 percent of the ocean needs to be protected in fully protected marine reserves.
    • Leaders around the world, but particularly from countries and territories located in the still relatively pristine Pacific Ocean, are moving to protect large and critically important ocean environments.  The U.S. should do its part and similarly protect a measurable portion of its own ocean territory.
    • Earlier this year, Palauan President Tommy Remengesau announced his intent to fully protect 80% of Palau’s Exclusive Economic Zone.
    • The Cook Islands have created a no-take marine reserve 50 miles around the southern islands in the archipelago.
    • The U.K. government is considering full protection of the Pitcairn Islands’ EEZ in the South Pacific (322,781 square miles), which would become the largest fully protected marine reserve on Earth.
    • President Anote Tong of Kiribati announced the creation of a no-take marine reserve to protect over 154,440 square miles surrounding the Phoenix Islands.  He has also indicated his intent to establish a no-take reserve around the Southern Line Islands – the southern counterpart to the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument atolls.
    • Even with these significant designations, most of the ocean, and most of the Pacific Ocean, remain open to extractive activities including fishing and mining.

    Why the Expansion is Needed:

     

     

    • The world’s oceans are threatened by overfishing, pollution, habitat destruction, ocean acidification, climate change, and invasive species.
    • The existing monument is insufficient in size to fully protect the many species that live inside the monument and range outside.  Expansion to the EEZ limit would enable far greater protection and provide a vital refuge for protected and vulnerable/endangered marine mammals, sea turtles, and seabirds from longline fishing interaction in the Pacific Ocean.
    • There is no scientific or ecological rationale for only protecting only out to 50 nautical miles from the islands and atolls, which is the current limit.  Protection to 200 nautical miles would benefit significantly more of the entire ecosystem and help ensure its long-term viability.
    • An estimated 90% of all large predatory fish worldwide have been wiped out.  The UN Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that about 90 percent of global fish stocks are overfished or fully-fished according to The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, 2014.
    • Research shows that fully protected marine reserves are essential to rebuilding species abundance and diversity, and increasing resilience to climate change.  Hundreds of leading scientists agree that fully protected – or “no-take” – reserves are critical for reversing the decline of the marine environment and restoring it to health.
    • Currently less than 1 percent of the ocean is protected in no-take marine reserves.
    • Highly controversial drilling and mining operations are being planned in similar areas of the Pacific under other nations’ control, imperiling priceless living marine resources living there.  The proposed marine monument expansion would protect the Pacific Remote Islands and atolls from potential future industrial development, including drilling or mining.

    Minimal Impacts of the Expansion:

     

    • The islands and atolls are uninhabited other than a small military operation; they have been uninhabited for most of their history.  The islands, atolls, and waters around them remain some of the most undisturbed areas on the planet, and their protection would affect very few current users.  No subsistence fishing or gathering occurs in the area.  A miniscule amount of recreational fishing is allowed and is restricted to specific places or by special permit.  This fishing could continue with minimal impact.
    • The U.S. distant-water commercial fishing fleet, based in Hawai‘i, is the only industry currently operating in this area, and they fish near the edges of U.S. jurisdiction.  Since Hawai’i-based tuna fishing vessels catch on average only 5 percent of their fish within the proposed monument area, the expansion will have minimal impact on them.  In addition, tuna and other offshore species migrate seasonally across the Pacific, which means that fishermen could recoup the small amount of lost harvest in other areas.  The fleet could replace the catch by making small shifts in fishing activity, thereby conserving this entire set of remote areas as marine wilderness.
    • Protecting these essential ocean habitats and species may actually benefit fisheries, since marine reserves can help replenish some depleted fisheries.  This occurs through increased reproduction within reserves, larval distribution, and fish spillover that benefits adjacent, unprotected areas.  The fish that are protected in marine reserves are likely to grow older and larger and produce more young that seed adjacent areas open to fishing.
    • Restricting fishing in the marine monument is akin to the traditional Hawaiian kapu system, where take was forbidden from closed reef areas. Traditional ecological knowledge and Western science both document the benefits of no-take areas for preserving marine resources.
    • There is an operational U.S. military base on Wake Island.  Wake Island is strictly off-limits to non-military personnel.  Military activities and the right of “innocent passage” are permitted within the existing monument.

    More Information:

     

  • Important Wetland and Cultural Resource- Kawainui, Kailua Meeting

    THE KAILUA NEIGHBORHOOD BOARD (KNB) WILL BE HOLDING A COMMUNITY DISCUSSION MEETING ON THE KAWAINUI-HAMAKUA MARSH MASTER PLAN RECENTLY RELEASED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES (DLNR). THE NEW DRAFT OF THE PLAN, THAT HAS MAJOR IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ECOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, CULTURAL, ARCHEOLOGICAL AND FLOOD CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MARSH, HAS BEEN GIVEN VERY LITTLE PUBLICITY, AND NO OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION.
    THE KNB, LANIKAILUA OUTDOOR CIRCLE, HAWAII’S THOUSAND FRIENDS, THE AUDUBON SOCIETY, KE KAHUA O KUALI`I, KEEP IT KAILUA AND OTHERS EXPRESSED SERIOUS CONCERNS WITH THE PREVIOUS DRAFT OF THE PLAN, YET THE NEW DRAFT RELEASED MAY 22, 2014 IS ESSENTIALLY THE SAME AS THE PREVIOUS DRAFT.
    THE KNB HAS REQUESTED THE DIRECTOR OF DLNR, WILLIAM ALIA, TO PRESENT THE PLAN AT THE MEETING, AND COMMUNITY RESIDENTS WILL BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS THEIR OPINIONS ON THE PROJECT. THIS MAY BE THE ONLY OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO BEFORE THE PLAN IS SUBMITTED FOR A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.
    THE MEETING WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY, JUNE 5, 2014 AT 7:00 PM AT THE KAILUA RECREATION CENTER, 21 S. KAINALU DRIVE, KAILUA. ALL KAILUA RESIDENTS, AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS ARE URGED TO ATTEND.
    A COPY OF THE PLAN IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT WWW.HHF.COM/KAWAINUI.
     
    Photo credit:  Lisa Hinano Rey, December 2014. 
  • Your Invited !!

    Details about our aforementioned General Membership Meeting this Sunday, May 25, 2014.

    What: The Environmental Caucus of the Democratic Party of Hawai’i invites you join us… perhaps you would like to run for a steering committee position, nominate potential candidates and help us vote for nominees.

    Elections of Steering Committee Members consists of 4 officers and 3 at-large positions.

    When: Sunday, May 25, 2014 at 10:00 am Sharp to 10:30

    Where: Stop at the Environmental Caucus table in the lobby of the Sheraton Waikiki to sign in no later than 9:30 am and get directions to the suite where the elections will be held promptly at 10am. 

    Send any questions to: ecodemhi@gmail.com

     

  • Keep the Date

    Keep the Date

    Positions presented may not necessarily match the official platform of the Environmental Caucus of the Democratic Party of Hawaii.
    The Environmental Caucus does fully support Right to Know legislation and we strive to learn and inform the public about the issues surrounding pesticides and GMO.

  • Action Request – taken from www.fooddemocracynow.org

    Action Request - taken from www.fooddemocracynow.org

    Add your voice to the growing opposition to all things Roundup!! The Environmental Caucus of the Democratic Party of Hawaii has taken up the position that consumers have the RIGHT TO KNOW the truth about GMO, Roundup and Monsanto seed engineering programs. Please join us in this action which demands that the EPA take a cautionary approach to Glyphosate levels at the Federal Level.

  • Reasons to support SB 1166 to fund watershed protectiion- Mahalo Marjorie Ziegler of Conservation Council for Hawaiʻi

    The Conservation Council for Hawai‘i strongly supports HB 935, which increases the conveyance tax on high-end real estate transactions and directs an additional ten percent of conveyance tax proceeds to the Natural Area Reserve Fund for watershed protection and invasive species control. Invasive species are one of the most significant threats to our watersheds, native species, habitats, cultural areas, recreation areas, and agricultural lands. 

    ·        The Rain Follows the Forest initiative is working to ensure fresh water is available for the people of Hawai‘i in perpetuity by protecting our watershed forests, a central goal of A New Day in Hawai‘i plan.

    ·        Healthy forests that are not overrun by invasive species efficiently capture and deliver fresh water into streams and aquifers for our use.

    ·        By pulling moisture from passing clouds, forests can actually increase water capture up to 50% more than through rainfall alone.  

    ·        When forests are lost or degraded, Hawai‘i loses its source of fresh water.

    ·        More than half of Hawaii’s forests have been lost.  Historically, the threat was overharvesting and development.  Today’s threat is invasive plants and animals.

    ·        The longer we wait to take significant action, the higher the cost will be to reverse the damage, thereby threatening water supplies for future generations.

    ·        Forests also help mitigate erosion and runoff into our precious streams and coastlines.

    ·        Healthy forests will become even more critical as we experience the likely effects of climate change, including more severe storms but overall less rainfall, and temperature changes that may benefit invasive pests.

    ·        The conveyance tax bill would support this watershed protection through essential forest management programs, invasive species control, land acquisition, and other conservation programs.    

    ·        The development and sale of real estate helps drive Hawaii’s economy, but it also puts pressure on our natural resources.  It makes sense to spend a portion of conveyance tax revenue on protecting those natural resources.

    ·        In recent years, enormous amounts have been invested in the development and sale of real estate, and continued investment in development and construction is helping to lift our economy out of recession.  Yet, we make a comparatively tiny investment in protecting the natural resources that also drive our economy and provide benefits that allow us to survive in the middle of the vast Pacific.

    Link to status and bill:

    http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/hearingnotices/HEARING_WTL-ENE_2-5-13_.HTM

    The Environmental Caucus of the Democratic Party has not formally taken a position on this Bill as of today. However action of this bill is time sensitive and has a direct impact on invasive species which is an important priority for the caucus.  Please look into this and submit your testimony today!!!

  • Save Lāna’i from Industial Windfarms

    Save Lāna’i from Industial Windfarms

    Stopping Windfarm development on Lāna’i is not the official platform of the Democratic Party of Hawai’i however many believe that decentralized energy production for local use and not centralized production for statewide distribution is the correct and sustainable solution for an island ecosystem.

    If you want to stop the State of Hawaii from rushing into a energy model which includes covering one third of a sister island like Lāna’i with wind turbines in order to provide Honolulu with electricity, sign this petition.

    Mahalo,

     

    Lisa Hinano Rey