Category: Action Alert

  • Call to action – SB 2511 SD 2 HD 2

    Posted by request of Marjorie Ziegler, ED Conservation Council for Hawaii. Not a position of the Democratic Party, Environmental Caucus.

    Aloha, everyone.  Please call Rep. Marcus Oshiro, Chair of House Finance Committee, at 808 586-6200 today and ask him to please schedule a hearing for SB 2511 SD 2 HD 2 (the plastic bag fee bill).  Today (Friday, March 30) is the last day for Rep. Oshiro to schedule a hearing for this important bill.  The bill has already passed four House committees and two Senate Committees.

    This bill encourages folks to use reusable bags, cuts down on energy, transportation, and solid waste costs, and perhaps most importantly, helps fund the State’s new watershed protection initiative “Hahai no ka ua i ka ulu la’au” “The Rain Follows the Forest.  Currently, we protect only 10% of our essential watersheds; the initiative proposes to double that to 20% in the next 10 years – a very good start if you drink water, bathe, and care about freshwater and our forested watersheds.

    Please call Rep. Oshiro now if can.  This one’s very important.  Let’s not let such a good bill get tabled by one person/committee in the legislature.  Imua!

    Mahalo nui loa!

  • Testify in support of Olelo – deadline April 5

    We ask you to submit testimony to the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (DCCA) in support of Oleloʻs application for a license to continue providing public access TV to Oahu.

    You can email catv@dcca.hawaii.gov, fax 586-2625, or mail DCCA-CATV, P.O. Box 541, Honolulu, HI 96809

    Some points you may want to cover are:

    •    Why is public access important to you?
    •    What is your personal experience with Olelo’s staff and services?
    •    How has Olelo made a difference in your life? To your organization?
    •    What additional service would you like Olelo to add?
    •    Why should the DCCA renew Olelo’s contract?
    Whatever you can do to help Olelo secure a new contract and protect public access in Hawaii is greatly appreciated.

    Why is Olelo important to the Environmental Caucus?

    Because Olelo produces our workshops that are broadcast live on the Internet so our members statewide can participate in our meetings.  I then edit these shows into half hour segments that Olelo can continue to broadcast and stream to the internet.  OLELO IS OUR VOICE TO HAWAII.

    I attended the DCCA. Thursday evening March 27 and gave personal testimony as an Olelo producer. We listen to oceanic Time Warner call Olelo a corrupt, ineffective organization that should have its budget slashed and its organization dismembered. Their testimony was countered by about 30 very passionate Olelo producers who recounted how positively Olelo has affected their lives. Olelo is the voice of our community.

    Be aware that Oceanic Time Warner is a very powerful foe of public access television in Hawaii. Every year, Oceanic introduces legislation designed to both breakup Olelo as an organization and to slash the Olelo budget. Oceanic takes every opportunity to attack Olelo as they did last night in the DCCA hearing.

    Only your voice can preserve our axis to community-based public television. Take a moment now to express your support for Olelo to the DCCA. The deadline for your testimony is April 5. For more information go to FreeSpeechHawaii.org.

  • Farm Land in double jeprody

    Posting courtesy of Laura Thielen.

    Please read this, and if you are concerned about what is happening, cut and paste the email addresses at the bottom and send an email to the Legislature TODAY.

    The Legislature is poised to pass two bills that will eradicate more high quality farmland than Ho’opili.

    SB 2341 allows vacation rentals on agricultural lands, including the highest production lands.  Even worse, vacation rentals can be the primary use, no farming is required.

    SB 2350 doubles the number of houses permitted on agricultural lots with one ohana dwelling for each farm dwelling.*

    If these bills pass, the number of houses built on agricultural lands will dramatically increase and agricultural lots will be priced for their vacation rental value, not their farming potential.

    The expansion of tourism has already transformed other areas, like Windward Oahu.  The density of some communities doubled when ohana units were allowed.  The vacation rental market dominates many neighborhoods, affecting home prices.

    Nearly 16,000 acres of farmland on Oahu’s North Shore are being marketed for great views or access to the ocean.  These qualities aren’t relevant to farming; they’re relevant to tourism.  The bill permitting vacation rentals as a primary use will destroy any ability to assure these lands remain available for agricultural production.

    The price of Oahu farmland is nearly out of reach for food farms today.  These bills will make it impossible for food farms to operate.  The vast majority of Oahu’s food is grown on rented land.  Will landlords force farms to close when neighboring vacation rentals complain about noise, or when they realize they can increase their rental income by transforming all or some of the property to vacation rentals?

    The Department of Agriculture, Office of Planning, and City and County of Honolulu have all testified against these bills and the Farm Bureau has raised serious concerns.

    Our Constitution requires the State to assure the availability of agricultural lands for agriculture.  The law requires directing non-agricultural uses away from the best farmland.  Several bills before the Legislature this session support increasing local food production.

    How is it that the Legislature on one hand says it supports agriculture, but on the other hand takes action to pass laws that will transform the agricultural district into the rural tourist district?

    The Senate unanimously passed both bills.  They are now at the House Committee on Water Land and Ocean Resources.

    Contact legislators at the links below and tell them to stop SB 2341 and SB 2350.

    Email addresses for Chair Jerry Chang, Vice Chair Sharon Har and Committee members:

    repchang@capitol.hawaii.gov; rephar@capitol.hawaii.gov; repcabanilla@capitol.hawaii.gov; repcarroll@capitol.hawaii.gov; repcoffman@capitol.hawaii.gov; repherkes@capitol.hawaii.gov; repito@capitol.hawaii.gov; repkawakami@capitol.hawaii.gov, repnakashima@capitol.hawaii.gov, repriviere@capitol.hawaii.gov, repthielen@capitol.hawaii.gov

    * While the ohana unit bill was amended to take out Oahu, it just as easily can be put back in, now or next year.

  • The Dirty 8 + a few

    I signed a petition against the bills to gut our environmental reviews.  SB755 now contains many of the exemptions, but other exemptions are in separate bills.  County Plans and Zoning will be able to be ignored and citizen participation is minimized.  SB 2927 allows for development projects in vicinity of rail and bus hubs to be exempt from county planning and zoning.  The environmental laws enacted in the 1970s are under attack, and your help is needed.  Please keep up the pressure.

    The administration is doing everything possible to eliminate all impediments to State projects the Governor wants to implement in the name of jobs.  The proposed legislation in these bills will eliminate environmental review and county plans and zoning and even building codes.  These projects will be implemented with no opportunity for citizen review or oversight.

    Many of these bills have been slipped into the process at the last minute.  SB755 was a gambling bill that was gutted and the permit exemption language was inserted.  It would have snuck through unnoticed except for Henry Curtis and Rep Thielen who alerted the environmental community.

    SB755 is referred to FIN. Email Rep Oshiro at repmoshiro@capitol.hawaii.gov or call his office at 586-6200 and ask him to hold SB755.  If the bill is scheduled for a hearing you can submit testimony by going to capitol.hawaii.gov.  Enter SB755 in the bill search box, then click on testimony and fill out the form.

    Remember who voted for these terrible bills when it comes time for you to vote.

    Bill Sager

  • One day to make a difference

    The Legislature is scheduled to end Tuesday, May 5th.  Senators and Representative vote on the final version of remaining bills – meaning – both chambers must give each bill a yes vote or it dies.  (Links are below)

    If you want a bill to die, contact the legislators, give them your name and simply ask them to “Vote NO on HB1566 and SB1555” or whatever bill number(s) you are interested in. The attachment to this email has legislators’ contact information. (Visiting the office on Monday, call & leave a message or faxing is better than email.)

    Each of the remaining bills contains something for everyone – statewide, whether it is waterfront public land development on the neighbor islands or raising the fees or adding requirements of the people already using a public facility.

    Michelle Matson did excellent bill summaries that will impact many folks (scroll waaay down to see her email).

    However of the ocean recreation issues in tracked bills – 3 are left.

    HB931 – requires all DLNR harbor slipholders to exit their harbor every 90 days.  The problem with this is the Harbor Master must see your boat leave.  That means 8-5 Monday to Friday.  If you go out at night or on the weekend no one is there to document that you left.

    SB1555 allows development via privatization with 65 year leases. Allows DLNR to transfer public lands into a newly established Public Lands Development Corporation “to administer an appropriate and culturally-sensitive public land development program.”  Allows HCDA to provide assistance.

    HB1566 allows
    1) mooring fees statewide to be set be an appraiser but allows commercial operators to choose either the DOT rate of 1.8% of gross instead of DLNR’s rate of 3% of gross.
    2) converts recreational slips to commercial slips in Ala Wai and Keehi harbors but
    3) targets only Ala Wai to privatize the entire harbor – including parking areas – for development for hotels, timeshares, office space and other uses. Also eliminates and county special district requirements.

    Your window of opportunity is open until Monday night.

    Aloha and good luck.

    From: Michelle S. Matson
    Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 8:43 AM
    Subject: Legislative Time Bomb Update

    HB 1020 – Aloha Tower Development Corp. has been reactivated and will now be operating the Aloha Tower Complex with a reduced Board of 3 under DOT.  Thank you Bob Loy for assisting with turning this around and away from the HCDA in the Senate, thus helping to Save Irwin Park once again.  See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=1020

    SB 1247 – Transferring Aloha Tower Development Corp. planning and zoning functions to HCDA failed.  Senate WLH vice chair’s gutting and replacing with stand-alone casino and gaming agency failed.  See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=1247 and http://www.hawaiireporter.com/legalized-gambling-proposal-gains-new-life-at-hawaii-legislature/123

    GM 510 – The former chair of ATDC who lead the charge targeting Irwin Park at Aloha Tower for a multi-level parking garage, resulting in the State being sued and environmental organizations prevailing, is none other than the nominee for State Attorney General slated for confirmation on Tuesday.  See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=GM&billnumber=510

    SB 699 – OEQC remains underfunded.  See  http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=699

    HB 1566 – Allows commercial development and commercial vessel use of Ala Wai recreational boat harbor’s fast and submerged lands, with moorage fees by commercial appraisal..

    See  http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=1566

    HB 337 – By adding permit exemptions for Coconut Island per Senator Hee, Senate WLH ultimately killed this vital and benevolent bill to protect valuable Hawaiian fishponds.

    SB 1363 – Plastic bag glut and ocean garbage islands are still stuck in the Legislative vacuum.  See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=1363

    HB 1405 – After being gutted by Senate WLH to contain an unrelated issue, this bill has been restored to enable the Office of Planning to establish a system of green gateways and trails.  See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=1405

    HB 1082 – Establishes the DLNR Conservation and Resources Enforcement Special Fund to be used toward the protection of the State’s natural, cultural, and historic resources. See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=1082

    HB 331 – After Senate WLH gyrations and contortions of speculative maneuvering by adding unrelated sections to a) protect wildlife and b) establish a public lands development corporation, the contents of this bill were returned to allowing the BLNR to modify state land leases to not exceed a term of 65 years. See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=331

    SB 1530 – Allows extension of state land leases for not longer than 55 years on hotel or resort uses planning  “substantial improvements.”  See  http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=1530

    SB 2 – Requires DLNR state land inventory and database covering state land under all agencies.  See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=2

    SCR 172 and HCR 283 – HCDA operations and management audit request went nowhere. See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SCR&billnumber=172 and http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HCR&billnumber=283

    HB 680 – Repeals HCDA’s statutory requirement to collaborate and consider the recommendations of the community-based CPAC for any plans for Kaka’ako Makai.  Fifty (50) testimonies from organizations and individuals strongly opposed HB 680 disabling community-based planning participation, collaboration and consensus forums for Kaka’ako Makai.  But this did not seem to make any difference to a Legislature lead on by district representatives, developer-driven committee chairs and their followers this year.  A developer-initiated smear campaign against the diligent community-based CPAC carried the bill through only two (2) committee hearings by House WLO and Senate WLH, and it is now headed to the Governor’s office.  See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/bills/HB680_CD1_.htm

    SB 261 – The Hawaiian Cultural Center for Kaka’ako Makai supported by community consensus stalled in House FIN.  See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=261

    SB 1555 – Establishes a Public Lands Development Corporation “to administer an appropriate and culturally-sensitive public land development program.”  Allows HCDA to provide assistance.  See http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/lists/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=1555:

    § -1 Findings and purpose.  … Creating a development arm of the department of land and natural resources…

    The corporation shall coordinate and administer programs to make optimal use of public land… shall identify the public lands that are suitable for development… carry on marketing analysis to determine the best revenue-generating programs…. enter into public-private agreements to appropriately develop the public lands identified…  Permissible uses of public land pursuant to this chapter shall include but not be limited to office space; vehicular parking; commercial uses; hotel, residential, and timeshare uses; fueling facilities; storage and repair facilities; and seawater air conditioning plants.
    The board of directors of the public land development corporation shall consist of five voting members. The members shall include: (1) The chairperson of the board of land and natural resources, or the first deputy to the chairperson of the board of land and natural resources; (2) The director of finance, or the director’s designee; (3) The director of business, economic development, and tourism, or the director’s designee; (4) One member to be appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives; and (5) One member to be appointed by the president of the senate; provided that the persons appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate shall possess sufficient knowledge, experience, and proven expertise in small and large businesses within the development or recreation industries, banking, real estate, finance, promotion, marketing, or management.  The term of office of the two voting members appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the senate shall be four years each.  The board shall appoint an executive director, who shall serve at the pleasure of the board…

    § -4 Powers; generally. (a) Except as otherwise limited by this chapter, the corporation may:  (7) Acquire or contract to acquire by grant or purchase: (A) All privately owned real property or any interest therein and the improvements thereon, if any, that are determined by the corporation to be necessary or appropriate for its purposes under this chapter, including real property together with improvements… (B) Encumbrances, in the form of leases, licenses, or otherwise, needed by the corporation or any state department or agency for public purposes, the disposition of subdivided lots, houselots, apartments or other economic units, or economic development;  (8) Own, hold, improve, and rehabilitate any real, personal, or mixed property acquired; and sell, assign, exchange, transfer, convey, lease, or otherwise dispose of, or encumber the same;   (9) By itself, or in partnership with qualified persons or other governmental agencies… own, hold, sell, assign, transfer, convey, exchange, lease, or otherwise dispose of, or encumber any project; and develop or manage, by itself, or in partnership with qualified persons or other governmental agencies, any project that meets the purposes of this chapter; (10) In cooperation with any governmental agency, or otherwise through direct investment or coventure with a professional investor or enterprise or any other person, or otherwise, acquire, construct, operate, and maintain public land facilities, including but not limited to leisure, recreational, commercial, residential, timeshare, hotel, office space, and business facilities, at rates or charges determined by the corporation; (12) Receive, examine, and determine the acceptability of applications of qualified persons for allowances or grants for the development of new recreation and visitor-industry related products, the expansion of established recreation and visitor-industry or land development enterprises, and the altering of existing recreational, visitor-industry related, or land development enterprises;  (14) Grant options to purchase any project or to renew any lease entered into by the corporation in connection with any of its projects, on the terms and conditions it deems advisable; (19) Subject to approval by the department, assume management responsibilities for small boat harbors in accordance with chapter 200 and any rules adopted pursuant thereto for periods not to exceed one year; (20) Recommend to the board of land and natural resources the purchase of any privately owned properties that may be appropriate for development;

    § -8 Approval of projects, plans, and programs. All public lands optimization projects, public land development plans, and project facility programs developed by the corporation shall be approved by the board.

    § -16 Transfer of public lands. (a) Notwithstanding chapter 171 (Conservation and Resources) or any provision of this chapter to the contrary, the department may transfer, subject to the approval of the board of land and natural resources, development rights for lands under its jurisdiction to the corporation for purposes of this chapter; provided that: (1) Development rights for all small boat harbors that have an existing contract in force and effect relating to a lease or development agreement, or a request for proposal that has been advertised or is under negotiation for capital improvements to harbor facilities as of July 1, 2011, shall be transferred to the corporation on July 1, 2011… if the public land corporation is not fully operational by July 1, 2011, the department shall continue to execute its responsibilities relating to negotiating or executing a contract for any such request for proposal or managing any existing contract until the corporation is able to assume the negotiating, oversight, and management responsibilities relating to the existing contract or request for proposal, as the case may be, or until June 30, 2013, whichever occurs first; (2) If the property to be developed is two hundred acres or less and the board of land and natural resources approves the transfer of development rights appurtenant to the property to be developed, the development rights shall be transferred to the corporation; (3) If the property to be developed is greater than two hundred acres and the board of land and natural resources approves the transfer of development rights appurtenant to the property to be developed, the development rights shall be transferred to the corporation, subject to disapproval by the legislature by two-thirds vote of either the senate or the house of representatives or by majority vote of both houses in any regular or special session next following the date of transfer; and (b) If the corporation finds that state lands under the control and management of the department or other public agencies are suitable for its purposes under this chapter, the corporation may lease the lands from the agency having the control and management of those lands, upon such terms and conditions as may be agreed to by the parties.

    § -19 Exemption from requirements. Notwithstanding section 171-42 (Hotel and resort uses) and except as otherwise noted in this chapter, projects pursuant to this chapter shall be exempt from all statutes, ordinances, charter provisions, and rules of any government agency relating to special improvement district assessments or requirements; land use, zoning, and construction standards for subdivisions, development, and improvement of land; and the construction, improvement, and sale of homes thereon; provided that the public land planning activities of the corporation shall be coordinated with the county planning departments and the county land use plans, policies, and ordinances.

    Hawaii Community Development Authority (HCDA)

    SECTION 2. Section 206E-4, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows: “§206E-4 Powers; generally. Except as otherwise limited by this chapter, the authority may:  (19) Assist the public land development corporation established by section -3 in identifying public lands that may be suitable for development, carrying on marketing analysis to determine the best revenue-generating programs for the public lands identified, entering into public-private agreements to appropriately develop the public lands identified, and providing the leadership for the development, financing, improvement, or enhancement of the selected development opportunities; provided that no assistance shall be provided unless the authority authorizes the assistance.”

    HCDA Executive Director:  The Kaka’ako Makai community-based master plan is “a flexible conceptual framework… subject to foreclosure.”

  • Surviving Bills – Resolutions needed.

    The legislature is winding down.  Bills are either in conference or ready for a floor vote.  The following conservation bills where in conference as of Friday, 4/9/11,  You cannot testify.  You can listen and you can talk to committee members when you can catch them at a free time.

    SB120 SD 1 – The Legacy Land Fund Bill is still alive and has been placed on the calendar for third reading.  It was heard on Wed. by House Finance, passed out of Committee on Thur with amendments.  The original version proposed to zero out legacy for the next two years.  The amendment proposes to reduce the allocation of the real estate conveyance tax from 10 percent to 5 percent.  So rather than 4.5 mill or so, the Legacy fund would get about 2.25M.  About 400K of that is reserved for invasive species (internally through DOFAW), and about 500K for staffing and internal costs.  That leaves a little over 1.25M for land conservation projects.  A victory of sorts in these hard time.

     

    http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/Bills/SB120_HD1_.HTM (this is the current version of the bill)

    Our next challenge is to create resolutions to be submitted to the Oahu County Convention.  Resolutions are due by April 25.  Take a look at the priority issues we discussed and voted on last fall.  Pick an issue you are passionate about, create a resolution and get it to our steering committee meeting April 20.

    This is our chance to influence the party platform.

     

     

    HB865 Inspection fee increased from 50 cents to 75 cents per 1000 pounds of frieght for container inspection  Recommend for 3rd Reading 4/8/2011

    cargo inspection is necessary to prevent introduction of invasive alien spp. to the state.


  • Action Alert HB117 HD2 is bad bill

    ALERT Thursday 4/7 Senate Committee on Water, Land and Housing (Donovan Dela Cruz, chair) and Committee on Energy and Environment (Mike Gabbard, chair) will hear HB 117, HD2 which expedites approval and processing of certain projects within special management areas (SMA). Bill and hearing notice are attached.

    The bill makes 2 changes to HRS 204A-22 CZM

    1) The bill adds a new definition, underlined, of what isn’t development within Special Management Area (SMA) HTS 205A: “Construction of a single-family residence that is not part of a larger development or which does not exceed ten thousand sq feet of floor area.”

    Exempting 10,000 sq ft buildings from the definition of “development,” large residences up to 10,000 sq. ft. will not be subject to the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZM) permit process. This exemption allows developments up to 10,000 sq. ft. to escape review under CZM even in the most sensitive areas and without oversight would impede public access.

    2) The bill eliminates the value of a development which is the trigger for a minor/major SMA permit. “Special management area use permit” means an action by the authority authorizing development [the valuation of which exceeds $125,000 or which] that may have a substantial adverse environmental or ecological effect, taking into account potential cumulative effects.”

    Without a threshold dollar amount for minor permits, agencies will be under considerable pressure to distinguish between minor and major permits under the “no substantial adverse impact” as the sole determining factor.

     

    This change could increase litigation as residents fight to protect coastal areas, lead to confusion as to the limits of minor permits and eliminate the clear trigger for public participation, which is now required for anything over $125,000.

    Special management areas are areas in which coastal resources are likely to be impacted by development activities. Each county sets the boundaries for its SMA through the Coastal Zone Management Act. SMA boundaries may range from about 100 yards from the coastline to several miles inland, depending upon how far inland development may have an adverse impact on coastal resources.

    ACTION – ask the committee to keep the $125,000 threshold and to not allow an exemption for oceanfront houses, regardless of size.

     

  • Legacy Land Conservation Fund endangered

    This is extremely important.  Trust funds are set up to make sure activities that require consistant, log term effort are adequately funded.  Defunding the Legacy Land Conservation Fund for two years will jeopardize 6 years of effort and important on going efforts to help the homeless and to enable important conservation projects.

    FYI, Senate Bill 120, HD 1 is scheduled to be heard before the House Finance Committee on Tuesday, April 5 at 4:30 in Room 308.  Section VIII of the bill proposes to zero out the Legacy Land Conservation Fund for two years.  Please submit testimony regarding the importance of the fund:

    The hearing notice is at:

    http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2011/hearingnotices/HEARING_FIN_04-05-11_3_.HTM

    To submit testimony opposing this bill, please submit testimony today (if can) indicating:

    ·     Testifier’s name with position/title and organization;

    ·     The Committee the comments are directed to (House Finance Committee);

    ·     The date and time of the hearing (Tue, April 5 at 4:30);

    ·     Measure number (SB 120 HD 1); and

    ·     The number of copies the Committee is requesting (2 copies).

    Submit testimony in ONE of the following ways:

    PAPER:  2 copies to Room 306 in the State Capitol;

    FAX:       For comments less than 5 pages in length, transmit to 586-6001 (Oahu) or 1-800-535-3859 (for Neighbor Islanders without a computer to submit testimony through e-mail or the Web); or

    WEB:      For comments less than 4MB in size, transmit from the Web page at http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/emailtestimony.

    Talking points:

    -The Legacy Land Conservation Fund (LLCF) was passed in 2005 with broad support of the conservation and affordable housing communities, and the vast majorities of the House and Senate.

    -The LLCF has resulted in signature Legacy project in all the areas in which the fund was established to protect.  For example,  MA’O Farm for agriculture, Lapakahi State Historical Park for Hawaiian culture and coastal access, Honouliuli Forest Reserve for watershed and habitat protection.  For a complete list of projects:

    http://hawaii.gov/dlnr/dofaw/llcp/legacy-land-conservation-program-projects-new

    -The LLCF leverages significant sources of federal, county, and private dollars, and results in significant ecosystem services.  Studies in other areas of the U.S. suggest that land conservation returns $6 in ecosystem services for every $1 spent (e.g., avoiding treatment of drinking water, erosion and flood control, scenic resources that draw tourism).

    -The program has already been cut by 60% as real estate conveyances taxes have dropped during the poor economy.

    -The down economy is also a strategic time to invest in once-in-a lifetime land conservation opportunities that will never happen again — land values are down, and land conservation of scenic coastlines, agricultural land, and other important resources to Hawai’i — are more possible than ever.  If we don not have a small core program, we will lose these opportunities forever.

    -The program should not be zeroed out — staff would lose their jobs, the volunteer Legacy Land Conservation Commission would be disbanded, ongoing efforts to pass administrative rules would be halted, institutional knowledge would be lost.   Start up of the program from zero would difficult and costly.

    Mahalo for your help.

    Lea Hong

    Hawaiian Islands Program Director
    Trust for Public Land
    1136 Union Mall, Suite 202
    Honolulu, HI  96813
    808-524-8563 (direct)
    808-783-3653 (mobile)
    (808)-524-8565 (fax)

    The Trust for Public Land – Celebrating 35 years of conserving land for people–2 million acres and counting. www.tpl.org

     

  • Action Alert by Lisa Hinano Rey

    Aloha Members,
    Henry Curtis, Life of the Land requests that we inform our members about the following upcoming hearing Tuesday, 4/5/11 Room 308 at 2:00 pm by Finance
    on SB 367 – Energy; Interisland High Voltage Electric Transmission Cable System; Public Utilities Commission; Tax Exemptions.

    Henry Curtis has the following to say about this legislation: Oppose this legislation at: PLEASE OPPOSE THIS BILL!!

    “SB 367 SD3 HD1would create a PUC regulatory structure for undersea cables whereby ratepayers would carry all of the risk and the utility would make all of the profit.
     
    * The utility argument was that it had to happen this year so that a cable company could be chosen this fall.
     
    However, which islands will get proposed windfarms and which size the undersea cables need to be has hit a snag.
     
    Last year the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) ruled that both FirstWind (Moloka`i) and Castle & Cooke (Lana`i) had to file with the PUC by March 18, 2011  term sheets laying out the cost of wind energy.
     
    FirstWind defaulted and did not file a timely excuse. Almost 2 weeks late, FirstWind asked for an 8 month extension.
     
    * The argument that Big Wind is the only answer is also in dispute. The Big Wind EIS Preparation Notice said that there are two alternatives, Big Wind with planning and Big Wind without planning.
     
    Numerous comments to the EISPN challenged this.
     
    DBEDT Office of Planning (March 1, 2011): “it is necessary for the draft EIS to explore alternatives”
     
    US Environmental Protection Agency (Feb 28, 2011): “We recommend analysis of additional alternatives as early as possible” 
     
    Rather than rush thru a bad piece of legislation, we should wait until it has been determined whether Big Wind makes sense, and if so, under what conditions.
     
    Please hold SB 367

    Posted by Lisa Hinano Rey
    Energy and Climate Change Chair
    Environmental Caucus of the Democratic Party

  • paper and plastic bags

    Once again Hawaii has an opportunity to lead America on an important environmental issue: we could be the first state in the nation to significantly reduce consumption of throwaway paper and plastic bags.

    We’ve reached a make or break moment – a pivotal point where a little public action could be enough to secure victory. The bill to impose a fee on most single-use paper or plastic bags, is really close to passage.

    We already pay for these bags, but the cost is hidden in the overall price of the products we buy. Experience in other states and countries has proved that once people are made aware of what these bags cost – by being required to pay a small fee per bag at the checkout- they change their behavior and start to employ reusable bags.

    The bill has just one last committee to pass, Finance, and then a vote in the full House and Senate.

    We think 500 emails, phone calls, or public calls for its passage would probably be enough to get it passed. Wouldn’t you like to be one of those 500?

    It’s really easy – just email all the Senators and all the members of the House of Representatives with a single click on each of these links below:
    sens@capitol.hawaii.gov
    reps@capitol.hawaii.gov

    Say something along these lines:

    • I strongly support legislative efforts to reduce the use of paper and plastic bags.
    • Over 12,000 plastic bags are used in the United States every second.
    • In this country we consume an astounding 100 billion throwaway plastic bags every year made from some 12 million barrels of oil.
    • These bags clog our streets, foul our open space, pollute our fragile marine environment and kill thousands if animals every year.

    Please pass SB1363 and protect Hawaii’s fragile environment from the millions of bags wasted each year.

    And once you’ve done that, could you recruit a friend or two to join in?  Forward this to everyone you know and have them click here.

    Bill Sager